Ticket #1278 (closed prototype: fixed)

Opened 12 years ago

Last modified 12 years ago

Redesign of group page

Reported by: hans Owned by: tarmo
Priority: critical Milestone: 1.9
Component: generic Version:
Keywords: Cc:
Time planned: Time remaining:
Time spent:

Description (last modified by hans) (diff)

Based on #1212 groups should have forums, not blogs. This means the following changes to layout:

  • Remove portlets "Archives", "Categories", "Links"
  • From "Actions" portlet remove links "New post", "Edit categories", "Edit links"
  • Remove other code that is needed for managing categories and links

Group page will display three random learning resources that are assigned to the group and have a cover image. There is a portlet for browsing other resources and a tag cloud.

Forum posts will be listed as a table, up to 20 topics on each page.

Each topic will be displayed as we display blog post and comments. We only have to remove categories.

Each group forum will have RSS feed, all posts in that group appear in one feed (both title and body text in RSS).



group.png (178.6 KB) - added by hans 12 years ago.

Change History

Changed 12 years ago by hans

comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by hans

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by hans

Teemu agrees with that. Tarmo?

comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by tarmo

  • Owner changed from anonymous to tarmo
  • Status changed from new to assigned
  • Milestone set to 1.9

comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by jukka

About those last post dates. Is it ok if I do dates like this (uses partly same system as 'what's going on?'-page)

timediff =

  • less than 1 min = less than minute ago
  • 1<n<60 min = n minutes ago
  • 1<n<24 h = n hours ago
  • 1<n<31 d = n days ago
  • n>31d = date of posting in localized date format (I believe plone-site can define its date format and these have translations)

So I propose omiting the week, as it would be difficult to move to next unit after it. Also, at some point looking at date is more informative than calculating how long ago it was: for example '18 months ago' vs '15 months ago' isn't meaningful difference, with times like that dates like '13.9. 2005' give more relevant context .

comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by hans

Let's move the discussion to #1281. Basically you are right, but:

  • I wouldn't have "less than minute ago"
  • "3 weeks ago" would look better than "23 days ago"

comment:6 Changed 12 years ago by tarmo

  • Status changed from assigned to closed
  • Resolution set to fixed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.